Can't say that I'm sad to see these go. For the most part, I don't like the idea of computerized cameras ticketing citizens when there is such a blatant conflict of interest involved. The company that made the cameras were getting paid for doling out tickets, which is a little bit of horseshit. If it were less of a controversial subject, I'd perhaps have a differing opinion. There are valid arguments against the fairness and legitimacy of the technology. There is also data that shows that while t-bone style accidents were on the decline, rear enderswere on the rise. That's not great results. Also, they are going to leave the cameras there as a deterrent, even though they are not doing anything.
I'm not completely against automated law enforcement though. For instance, if we could invent a robotic turret of sorts that could identify a perpetrator in the middle of committing a crime and deliver non-lethal stoppage with 100% accuracy, that would be cool. I may be able to get behind that. We can call it "Crime Stopper 2000". You need the number to make it sound cooler.
Comments